Scientific qualityPlanned
Making evidence visible
A traceable review process for high-impact substance information, with sources, responsibilities and documented corrections.
Planned activities
- Publish review criteria and priorities
- Check claims against their original sources
- Label expert reviews with their scope and date
Risk communicationPlanned
Understanding interactions
Expand substance-specific evidence on interactions and communicate uncertainty clearly. Class-based assumptions should remain identifiable.
Planned activities
- Prioritize by relevance to risk
- Document literature and evidence gaps
- Separate substance-specific and class evidence
Open knowledgePlanned
Keeping knowledge accessible
Freely accessible knowledge with understandable source information and clear limits, without barriers to essential safety information.
Planned activities
- Develop accessible educational formats
- Make sources and updates traceable
- Establish free access to core knowledge as a funding principle
TranslationPlanned
Knowledge across languages
Make reviewed educational content accessible beyond German. Translations should preserve the visible review status of their source texts.
Planned activities
- Select priority content for translation
- Review terminology and risk language
- Document version and provenance
Harm reductionPlanned
Explaining risks clearly
Develop educational resources that explain uncertainties and limits clearly and point to existing help resources.
Planned activities
- Design clear resources for education
- Review accessibility and clarity
- Document feedback and corrections
Research infrastructurePlanned
A foundation for research
Prepare literature maps, documented data and future collaboration. No research partnerships have yet been confirmed.
Planned activities
- Clarify data provenance and usage rights
- Plan literature maps with clear inclusion criteria
- Publish requirements for future collaboration